From 1 November 2007, any person who moves into or out of Singapore cash exceeding SGD 30,000 (the prescribed amount) or its equivalent in a foreign currency, is required to give a report in respect of its movements. Any person who receives cash exceeding the prescribed amount from outside Singapore is also required to give a report within five business days upon receipt. The Act provides exemptions from the reporting requirement. A commercial passenger carrier is not required to give a report in respect of cash in the possession of its passengers. A commercial goods carrier is also not required to give a report if the cash is carried on behalf of another person and the other person has not disclosed to the carrier that the goods carried include cash and the carrier does not know and has no reasonable ground to believe that the goods carried on behalf of the other person include cash.

What is the currency allowance for British persons enterins the United States of America

Powered by

Kinda scary.. head of imf proposes new reserve currency imf's strauss-kahn suggests imf may one day provide global reserve asset by harry dunphy associated press writer washington february 26, 2010 (ap) the associated press dominique strauss-kahn, the head of the international monetary fund, suggested friday the organization might one day be called on to provide countries with a global reserve currency that would serve as an alternative to the u.s. dollar. "that day has not yet come, but i think it is intellectually healthy to explore these kinds of ideas now," he said in a speech on the future mandate of the 186-nation washington-based lending organization. strauss-kahn said such an asset could be similar to but distinctly different from the imf's special drawing rights, or sdrs, the accounting unit that countries use to hold funds within the imf. it is based on a basket of major currencies. he said having other alternatives to the dollar "would limit the extent to which the international monetary system as a whole depends on the policies and conditions of a single, albeit dominant, country." strauss-kahn, a former finance minister of france, said that during the recent global financial crisis, the dollar "played its role as a safe haven" asset, and the current international monetary system demonstrated resilience. "the challenge ahead is to find ways to limit the tension arising from the high demand for precautionary reserves on the one hand and the narrow supply of reserves on the other," he said. several countries, including china and russia, have called for an alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency and have suggested using the imf's internal accounting unit. strauss-kahn said the imf also needs to do a better job of tracing how risk percolates through the global economy. "here it will be essential to improve our ability to monitor several dozen large complex financial institutions that make up the `plumbing' through which global capital flows," he said, while leaving national regulators the job of monitoring the solvency of individual institutions. http://abcnews.go.com/business/wire story?id=9958995

It's a terrible idea. The value of the currency would go down. The value of Mexican currency and other currencies from poor nations would bring it down.

Powered by

Global impact mcdonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes referred as the "mcdonaldization" of society. the economist magazine uses the "big mac index": the comparison of a big mac's cost in various world currencies can be used to informally judge these currencies' purchasing power parity. because mcdonald's is closely identified with american culture and lifestyle, its international business expansion has been termed[by who?] part of americanization and american cultural imperialism. mcdonald's is a perpetual target of various and often conflicting anti-globalization protests worldwide. the brand is known informally as "mickey d's" (in the us and canada), "macky d's" (in the uk), "mcdo" (in france, quebec, the philippines, and the kansai region of japan), "maccer's" (in ireland), "maccas" (in new zealand and australia) or "de mac" (in the netherlands). thomas friedman once said that no country with a mcdonald's had gone to war with another.[8] however, the "golden arches theory of conflict prevention" is not strictly true. careful historians point to the 1989 united states invasion of panama, when nato bombed serbia in 1999, and the 2006 lebanon war as exceptions. some observers have suggested that the company should be given credit for increasing the standard of service in markets that it enters. a group of anthropologists in a study entitled golden arches east (stanford university press, 1998, edited by james l. watson) looked at the impact mcdonald's had on east asia, and hong kong in particular. when it opened in hong kong in 1975, mcdonald's was the first restaurant to consistently offer clean restrooms, driving customers to demand the same of other restaurants and institutions. in east asia in particular, mcdonald's have become a symbol for the desire to embrace western cultural norms. mcdonald's have recently taken to partnering up with sinopec, china's second largest oil company, in the people's republic of china, as it begins to take advantage of china's growing use of personal vehicles by opening numerous drive-thru restaurants. [9] in addition to its effect on business standards, mcdonald's has also been instrumental in changing local customs. by popularizing the idea of a quick restaurant meal, watson's study suggests, mcdonald's led to the easing or elimination of various taboos, such as eating while walking in japan.[dubious – discuss] criticismpotted plants at a mcdonald's. the company has been a target of criticism practically since its inception. since the mid-1990s this protest has taken the form of an anti-globalization movement as documented in naomi klein's manifesto no logo. mcdonald's restaurants have been the targets of protests, peaceful and otherwise, by environmental, anti-globalization and animal rights activists. the company has used a litigious approach to protecting its business interests. this conflict, and the company's approach to resolving it, was epitomized in the early 1990s by what came to be known as the mclibel case. two british activists, david morris and helen steel, distributed leaflets entitled what's wrong with mcdonald's? on the streets of london. mcdonald's wrote to steel and morris demanding they desist and apologize, and, when they refused, sued them for libel. the trial lasted more than two years. the company's advertising techniques and business practices were scrutinized in the high court of justice in london and reported extensively in the press, who saw the case as a david and goliath battle (under uk law, legal aid could not be granted for a defamation suit, so steel and morris did most of their own legal casework while mcdonald's was represented by an extensive legal team). in june 1997, the judge ruled in favor of mcdonald's, awarding the company £60,000 damages, which was later reduced to £40,000 by the court of appeal. the amount was low because the judge ruled that some of the claims made by morris and steel had been proved, including that mcdonald's exploited children in its advertising, was anti-trade union and indirectly exploited and caused suffering to animals. steel and morris announced they had no intention of ever paying, and the company later confirmed it would not be pursuing the money. steel and morris later successfully challenged uk libel law in the european court, arguing that it was an infringement of the right to free speech. the british government was forced to re-write the legislation as a result. in 2005, a film by ken loach was made about the court case. in 2001, eric schlosser's book fast food nation included criticism of mcdonald's' business practices. among the critiques are allegations that mcdonald's (along with other companies within the fast-food industry) uses its political influence to increase their own profits at the expense of people's health and the social conditions of its workers. the book also brings into question mcdonald's advertisement techniques where it targets children. while the book does mention other fast-food chains, it focuses primarily on mcdonald's. in 2002, vegetarian groups, largely hindu, successfully sued mcdonald's for misrepresenting their french fries as vegetarian.[10] even after the discontinuation of frying the french fries in beef tallow in 1990, the french fries still had beef extract added to them. the french fries sold in the u.s. still contain beef and animal flavoring. mcdonald's biscuits also contain beef flavoring along with animal flavoring. also in 2004, morgan spurlock's documentary film super size me said that mcdonald's food was contributing to the epidemic of obesity in society, and failing to provide nutritional information about its food for its customers. for 30 days spurlock ate nothing but mcdonald's (supersizing whenever asked). he ate everything on the menu at least once and continued to eat after he was full. at the same time he consciously attempted to get little or no exercise. by the end of the month he had gained 24.5 pounds (11.11 kg), was moody and had less interest in sex. others have disputed spurlock's claims (see below). after the film was shown at the sundance film festival, but before its cinematic release, mcdonald's stated it was phasing out its supersize meal option and would begin offering several healthier menu items, though no link to the film was cited in this decision. however, while the healthier menu items have appeared, the supersize meal option still remains available at some locations. the company also began a practice of putting nutritional information for all menu items in light grey small print on the reverse of their tray liners. it is currently phasing in nutritional labeling in clear black print on the actual packaging of its food items. anthony bourdain on his show, no reservations, has criticised mcdonald's among other fast-food restaurants for its culinary blandness. legal challenge over trans fats in september 2002, mcdonald’s announced it was voluntarily reducing the trans fat content of its cooking oil by february 2003. because of operational problems, the oil was not changed on time. in the ensuing lawsuits, plaintiffs claimed that mcdonald’s didn't do enough to inform the public that the oil was not changed. the bantransfat.com website contains testimonials from people, one claims she thought the oil was low in trans fat, and she said, "that is why i have been eating there every week..." in a settlement agreement, bantransfat.com said "while there is a difference of opinion regarding whether mcdonald’s gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, mcdonald’s deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels ... and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils." nevertheless, bantransfat.com demanded monetary damages. settlement of the lawsuit brought by bantransfats.com and one private party requires mcdonald’s spend up to $1.5 million to publish notices on the status of its trans fat initiative. mcdonald’s will also donate $7 million to the american heart association for public education about trans fat. [3]. the settlement also requires some money be paid directly to bantransfat.com. the california superior court for marin county has entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. supporters of mcdonald's point out that the company is successful because it meets the needs of customers and adapts to its customers wants. in response to public pressure, mcdonald's has sought to include more healthy choices in its menu and has introduced a new slogan to its recruitment posters: "not bad for a mcjob". (the word mcjob, first attested in the mid-1980s[11] and later popularized by canadian novelist douglas coupland in his book generation x, has become a buzz word for low-paid, unskilled work with few prospects or benefits and little security.) mcdonald's disputes the idea that its restaurant jobs have no prospects, noting that its ceo, jim skinner, started working at the company as a regular restaurant employee, and that 20 of its top 50 managers began work as regular crew members. [12] in 2007, the company launched an advertising campaign with the slogan "would you like a career with that?" on irish television, outlining that their jobs have many prospects. in a bid to tap into growing consumer interest in the provenance of food, the fast-food chain recently switched its supply of both coffee beans and milk. uk chief executive steve easterbrook said: “british consumers are increasingly interested in the quality, sourcing and ethics of the food and drink they buy". mcdonald's coffee is now brewed from beans taken from stocks that have been certified by the conservation group the rainforest alliance. similarly, milk supplies used for its hot drinks and milkshakes have been switched to organic sources which could account for 5% of the uk's organic milk output[13]. in other cases, the firm has shown itself ready to adjust its business practices. when the public became concerned that product packaging was environmentally damaging, mcdonald's started a joint project with friends of the earth to eliminate the use of polystyrene containers, only in the united states, and to reduce the amount of waste produced. throughout the mclibel trial, senior representatives of the firm said they were merely trying to protect its image from undue and unfounded attack. with regard to its numerous and often controversial copyright and trademark actions, mcdonald's lawyers say they are simply protecting the company's intellectual property. super size me has been characterized as a non-scientific publicity stunt. the subject of the film consumes massive quantities of mcdonald's food, to the point of being sickened by it. eating on an hourly schedule and, as part of his rules, eating additional quantities each time a mcdonald's worker says the word "supersize," the subject gains weight. following the release of the film super size me, some people reported they had experienced no weight gain and suffered no ill effect by eating only at mcdonald's for a month, but choosing menu items more judiciously and exercising frequently.minimize me merab morgan, a north carolina woman, was even able to lose weight.woman loses 33 lb on mcdonald's diet she claimed that the transparency of nutritional information made it easy to control her daily caloric intake. global impact mcdonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes referred as the "mcdonaldization" of society. the economist magazine uses the "big mac index": the comparison of a big mac's cost in various world currencies can be used to informally judge these currencies' purchasing power parity. because mcdonald's is closely identified with american culture and lifestyle, its international business expansion has been termed[by who?] part of americanization and american cultural imperialism. mcdonald's is a perpetual target of various and often conflicting anti-globalization protests worldwide. the brand is known informally as "mickey d's" (in the us and canada), "macky d's" (in the uk), "mcdo" (in france, quebec, the philippines, and the kansai region of japan), "maccer's" (in ireland), "maccas" (in new zealand and australia) or "de mac" (in the netherlands). thomas friedman once said that no country with a mcdonald's had gone to war with another.[8] however, the "golden arches theory of conflict prevention" is not strictly true. careful historians point to the 1989 united states invasion of panama, when nato bombed serbia in 1999, and the 2006 lebanon war as exceptions. some observers have suggested that the company should be given credit for increasing the standard of service in markets that it enters. a group of anthropologists in a study entitled golden arches east (stanford university press, 1998, edited by james l. watson) looked at the impact mcdonald's had on east asia, and hong kong in particular. when it opened in hong kong in 1975, mcdonald's was the first restaurant to consistently offer clean restrooms, driving customers to demand the same of other restaurants and institutions. in east asia in particular, mcdonald's have become a symbol for the desire to embrace western cultural norms. mcdonald's have recently taken to partnering up with sinopec, china's second largest oil company, in the people's republic of china, as it begins to take advantage of china's growing use of personal vehicles by opening numerous drive-thru restaurants. [9] in addition to its effect on business standards, mcdonald's has also been instrumental in changing local customs. by popularizing the idea of a quick restaurant meal, watson's study suggests, mcdonald's led to the easing or elimination of various taboos, such as eating while walking in japan.[dubious – discuss] criticismpotted plants at a mcdonald's. the company has been a target of criticism practically since its inception. since the mid-1990s this protest has taken the form of an anti-globalization movement as documented in naomi klein's manifesto no logo. mcdonald's restaurants have been the targets of protests, peaceful and otherwise, by environmental, anti-globalization and animal rights activists. the company has used a litigious approach to protecting its business interests. this conflict, and the company's approach to resolving it, was epitomized in the early 1990s by what came to be known as the mclibel case. two british activists, david morris and helen steel, distributed leaflets entitled what's wrong with mcdonald's? on the streets of london. mcdonald's wrote to steel and morris demanding they desist and apologize, and, when they refused, sued them for libel. the trial lasted more than two years. the company's advertising techniques and business practices were scrutinized in the high court of justice in london and reported extensively in the press, who saw the case as a david and goliath battle (under uk law, legal aid could not be granted for a defamation suit, so steel and morris did most of their own legal casework while mcdonald's was represented by an extensive legal team). in june 1997, the judge ruled in favor of mcdonald's, awarding the company £60,000 damages, which was later reduced to £40,000 by the court of appeal. the amount was low because the judge ruled that some of the claims made by morris and steel had been proved, including that mcdonald's exploited children in its advertising, was anti-trade union and indirectly exploited and caused suffering to animals. steel and morris announced they had no intention of ever paying, and the company later confirmed it would not be pursuing the money. steel and morris later successfully challenged uk libel law in the european court, arguing that it was an infringement of the right to free speech. the british government was forced to re-write the legislation as a result. in 2005, a film by ken loach was made about the court case. in 2001, eric schlosser's book fast food nation included criticism of mcdonald's' business practices. among the critiques are allegations that mcdonald's (along with other companies within the fast-food industry) uses its political influence to increase their own profits at the expense of people's health and the social conditions of its workers. the book also brings into question mcdonald's advertisement techniques where it targets children. while the book does mention other fast-food chains, it focuses primarily on mcdonald's. in 2002, vegetarian groups, largely hindu, successfully sued mcdonald's for misrepresenting their french fries as vegetarian.[10] even after the discontinuation of frying the french fries in beef tallow in 1990, the french fries still had beef extract added to them. the french fries sold in the u.s. still contain beef and animal flavoring. mcdonald's biscuits also contain beef flavoring along with animal flavoring. also in 2004, morgan spurlock's documentary film super size me said that mcdonald's food was contributing to the epidemic of obesity in society, and failing to provide nutritional information about its food for its customers. for 30 days spurlock ate nothing but mcdonald's (supersizing whenever asked). he ate everything on the menu at least once and continued to eat after he was full. at the same time he consciously attempted to get little or no exercise. by the end of the month he had gained 24.5 pounds (11.11 kg), was moody and had less interest in sex. others have disputed spurlock's claims (see below). after the film was shown at the sundance film festival, but before its cinematic release, mcdonald's stated it was phasing out its supersize meal option and would begin offering several healthier menu items, though no link to the film was cited in this decision. however, while the healthier menu items have appeared, the supersize meal option still remains available at some locations. the company also began a practice of putting nutritional information for all menu items in light grey small print on the reverse of their tray liners. it is currently phasing in nutritional labeling in clear black print on the actual packaging of its food items. anthony bourdain on his show, no reservations, has criticised mcdonald's among other fast-food restaurants for its culinary blandness. legal challenge over trans fats in september 2002, mcdonald’s announced it was voluntarily reducing the trans fat content of its cooking oil by february 2003. because of operational problems, the oil was not changed on time. in the ensuing lawsuits, plaintiffs claimed that mcdonald’s didn't do enough to inform the public that the oil was not changed. the bantransfat.com website contains testimonials from people, one claims she thought the oil was low in trans fat, and she said, "that is why i have been eating there every week..." in a settlement agreement, bantransfat.com said "while there is a difference of opinion regarding whether mcdonald’s gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, mcdonald’s deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels ... and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils." nevertheless, bantransfat.com demanded monetary damages. settlement of the lawsuit brought by bantransfats.com and one private party requires mcdonald’s spend up to $1.5 million to publish notices on the status of its trans fat initiative. mcdonald’s will also donate $7 million to the american heart association for public education about trans fat. [3]. the settlement also requires some money be paid directly to bantransfat.com. the california superior court for marin county has entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. supporters of mcdonald's point out that the company is successful because it meets the needs of customers and adapts to its customers wants. in response to public pressure, mcdonald's has sought to include more healthy choices in its menu and has introduced a new slogan to its recruitment posters: "not bad for a mcjob". (the word mcjob, first attested in the mid-1980s[11] and later popularized by canadian novelist douglas coupland in his book generation x, has become a buzz word for low-paid, unskilled work with few prospects or benefits and little security.) mcdonald's disputes the idea that its restaurant jobs have no prospects, noting that its ceo, jim skinner, started working at the company as a regular restaurant employee, and that 20 of its top 50 managers began work as regular crew members. [12] in 2007, the company launched an advertising campaign with the slogan "would you like a career with that?" on irish television, outlining that their jobs have many prospects. in a bid to tap into growing consumer interest in the provenance of food, the fast-food chain recently switched its supply of both coffee beans and milk. uk chief executive steve easterbrook said: “british consumers are increasingly interested in the quality, sourcing and ethics of the food and drink they buy". mcdonald's coffee is now brewed from beans taken from stocks that have been certified by the conservation group the rainforest alliance. similarly, milk supplies used for its hot drinks and milkshakes have been switched to organic sources which could account for 5% of the uk's organic milk output[13]. in other cases, the firm has shown itself ready to adjust its business practices. when the public became concerned that product packaging was environmentally damaging, mcdonald's started a joint project with friends of the earth to eliminate the use of polystyrene containers, only in the united states, and to reduce the amount of waste produced. throughout the mclibel trial, senior representatives of the firm said they were merely trying to protect its image from undue and unfounded attack. with regard to its numerous and often controversial copyright and trademark actions, mcdonald's lawyers say they are simply protecting the company's intellectual property. super size me has been characterized as a non-scientific publicity stunt. the subject of the film consumes massive quantities of mcdonald's food, to the point of being sickened by it. eating on an hourly schedule and, as part of his rules, eating additional quantities each time a mcdonald's worker says the word "supersize," the subject gains weight. following the release of the film super size me, some people reported they had experienced no weight gain and suffered no ill effect by eating only at mcdonald's for a month, but choosing menu items more judiciously and exercising frequently.minimize me merab morgan, a north carolina woman, was even able to lose weight.woman loses 33 lb on mcdonald's diet she claimed that the transparency of nutritional information made it easy to control her daily caloric intake. global impact mcdonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes referred as the "mcdonaldization" of society. the economist magazine uses the "big mac index": the comparison of a big mac's cost in various world currencies can be used to informally judge these currencies' purchasing power parity. because mcdonald's is closely identified with american culture and lifestyle, its international business expansion has been termed[by who?] part of americanization and american cultural imperialism. mcdonald's is a perpetual target of various and often conflicting anti-globalization protests worldwide. the brand is known informally as "mickey d's" (in the us and canada), "macky d's" (in the uk), "mcdo" (in france, quebec, the philippines, and the kansai region of japan), "maccer's" (in ireland), "maccas" (in new zealand and australia) or "de mac" (in the netherlands). thomas friedman once said that no country with a mcdonald's had gone to war with another.[8] however, the "golden arches theory of conflict prevention" is not strictly true. careful historians point to the 1989 united states invasion of panama, when nato bombed serbia in 1999, and the 2006 lebanon war as exceptions. some observers have suggested that the company should be given credit for increasing the standard of service in markets that it enters. a group of anthropologists in a study entitled golden arches east (stanford university press, 1998, edited by james l. watson) looked at the impact mcdonald's had on east asia, and hong kong in particular. when it opened in hong kong in 1975, mcdonald's was the first restaurant to consistently offer clean restrooms, driving customers to demand the same of other restaurants and institutions. in east asia in particular, mcdonald's have become a symbol for the desire to embrace western cultural norms. mcdonald's have recently taken to partnering up with sinopec, china's second largest oil company, in the people's republic of china, as it begins to take advantage of china's growing use of personal vehicles by opening numerous drive-thru restaurants. [9] in addition to its effect on business standards, mcdonald's has also been instrumental in changing local customs. by popularizing the idea of a quick restaurant meal, watson's study suggests, mcdonald's led to the easing or elimination of various taboos, such as eating while walking in japan.[dubious – discuss] criticismpotted plants at a mcdonald's. the company has been a target of criticism practically since its inception. since the mid-1990s this protest has taken the form of an anti-globalization movement as documented in naomi klein's manifesto no logo. mcdonald's restaurants have been the targets of protests, peaceful and otherwise, by environmental, anti-globalization and animal rights activists. the company has used a litigious approach to protecting its business interests. this conflict, and the company's approach to resolving it, was epitomized in the early 1990s by what came to be known as the mclibel case. two british activists, david morris and helen steel, distributed leaflets entitled what's wrong with mcdonald's? on the streets of london. mcdonald's wrote to steel and morris demanding they desist and apologize, and, when they refused, sued them for libel. the trial lasted more than two years. the company's advertising techniques and business practices were scrutinized in the high court of justice in london and reported extensively in the press, who saw the case as a david and goliath battle (under uk law, legal aid could not be granted for a defamation suit, so steel and morris did most of their own legal casework while mcdonald's was represented by an extensive legal team). in june 1997, the judge ruled in favor of mcdonald's, awarding the company £60,000 damages, which was later reduced to £40,000 by the court of appeal. the amount was low because the judge ruled that some of the claims made by morris and steel had been proved, including that mcdonald's exploited children in its advertising, was anti-trade union and indirectly exploited and caused suffering to animals. steel and morris announced they had no intention of ever paying, and the company later confirmed it would not be pursuing the money. steel and morris later successfully challenged uk libel law in the european court, arguing that it was an infringement of the right to free speech. the british government was forced to re-write the legislation as a result. in 2005, a film by ken loach was made about the court case. in 2001, eric schlosser's book fast food nation included criticism of mcdonald's' business practices. among the critiques are allegations that mcdonald's (along with other companies within the fast-food industry) uses its political influence to increase their own profits at the expense of people's health and the social conditions of its workers. the book also brings into question mcdonald's advertisement techniques where it targets children. while the book does mention other fast-food chains, it focuses primarily on mcdonald's. in 2002, vegetarian groups, largely hindu, successfully sued mcdonald's for misrepresenting their french fries as vegetarian.[10] even after the discontinuation of frying the french fries in beef tallow in 1990, the french fries still had beef extract added to them. the french fries sold in the u.s. still contain beef and animal flavoring. mcdonald's biscuits also contain beef flavoring along with animal flavoring. also in 2004, morgan spurlock's documentary film super size me said that mcdonald's food was contributing to the epidemic of obesity in society, and failing to provide nutritional information about its food for its customers. for 30 days spurlock ate nothing but mcdonald's (supersizing whenever asked). he ate everything on the menu at least once and continued to eat after he was full. at the same time he consciously attempted to get little or no exercise. by the end of the month he had gained 24.5 pounds (11.11 kg), was moody and had less interest in sex. others have disputed spurlock's claims (see below). after the film was shown at the sundance film festival, but before its cinematic release, mcdonald's stated it was phasing out its supersize meal option and would begin offering several healthier menu items, though no link to the film was cited in this decision. however, while the healthier menu items have appeared, the supersize meal option still remains available at some locations. the company also began a practice of putting nutritional information for all menu items in light grey small print on the reverse of their tray liners. it is currently phasing in nutritional labeling in clear black print on the actual packaging of its food items. anthony bourdain on his show, no reservations, has criticised mcdonald's among other fast-food restaurants for its culinary blandness. legal challenge over trans fats in september 2002, mcdonald’s announced it was voluntarily reducing the trans fat content of its cooking oil by february 2003. because of operational problems, the oil was not changed on time. in the ensuing lawsuits, plaintiffs claimed that mcdonald’s didn't do enough to inform the public that the oil was not changed. the bantransfat.com website contains testimonials from people, one claims she thought the oil was low in trans fat, and she said, "that is why i have been eating there every week..." in a settlement agreement, bantransfat.com said "while there is a difference of opinion regarding whether mcdonald’s gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, mcdonald’s deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels ... and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils." nevertheless, bantransfat.com demanded monetary damages. settlement of the lawsuit brought by bantransfats.com and one private party requires mcdonald’s spend up to $1.5 million to publish notices on the status of its trans fat initiative. mcdonald’s will also donate $7 million to the american heart association for public education about trans fat. [3]. the settlement also requires some money be paid directly to bantransfat.com. the california superior court for marin county has entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. supporters of mcdonald's point out that the company is successful because it meets the needs of customers and adapts to its customers wants. in response to public pressure, mcdonald's has sought to include more healthy choices in its menu and has introduced a new slogan to its recruitment posters: "not bad for a mcjob". (the word mcjob, first attested in the mid-1980s[11] and later popularized by canadian novelist douglas coupland in his book generation x, has become a buzz word for low-paid, unskilled work with few prospects or benefits and little security.) mcdonald's disputes the idea that its restaurant jobs have no prospects, noting that its ceo, jim skinner, started working at the company as a regular restaurant employee, and that 20 of its top 50 managers began work as regular crew members. [12] in 2007, the company launched an advertising campaign with the slogan "would you like a career with that?" on irish television, outlining that their jobs have many prospects. in a bid to tap into growing consumer interest in the provenance of food, the fast-food chain recently switched its supply of both coffee beans and milk. uk chief executive steve easterbrook said: “british consumers are increasingly interested in the quality, sourcing and ethics of the food and drink they buy". mcdonald's coffee is now brewed from beans taken from stocks that have been certified by the conservation group the rainforest alliance. similarly, milk supplies used for its hot drinks and milkshakes have been switched to organic sources which could account for 5% of the uk's organic milk output[13]. in other cases, the firm has shown itself ready to adjust its business practices. when the public became concerned that product packaging was environmentally damaging, mcdonald's started a joint project with friends of the earth to eliminate the use of polystyrene containers, only in the united states, and to reduce the amount of waste produced. throughout the mclibel trial, senior representatives of the firm said they were merely trying to protect its image from undue and unfounded attack. with regard to its numerous and often controversial copyright and trademark actions, mcdonald's lawyers say they are simply protecting the company's intellectual property. super size me has been characterized as a non-scientific publicity stunt. the subject of the film consumes massive quantities of mcdonald's food, to the point of being sickened by it. eating on an hourly schedule and, as part of his rules, eating additional quantities each time a mcdonald's worker says the word "supersize," the subject gains weight. following the release of the film super size me, some people reported they had experienced no weight gain and suffered no ill effect by eating only at mcdonald's for a month, but choosing menu items more judiciously and exercising frequently.minimize me merab morgan, a north carolina woman, was even able to lose weight.woman loses 33 lb on mcdonald's diet she claimed that the transparency of nutritional information made it easy to control her daily caloric intake. global impact mcdonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes referred as the "mcdonaldization" of society. the economist magazine uses the "big mac index": the comparison of a big mac's cost in various world currencies can be used to informally judge these currencies' purchasing power parity. because mcdonald's is closely identified with american culture and lifestyle, its international business expansion has been termed[by who?] part of americanization and american cultural imperialism. mcdonald's is a perpetual target of various and often conflicting anti-globalization protests worldwide. the brand is known informally as "mickey d's" (in the us and canada), "macky d's" (in the uk), "mcdo" (in france, quebec, the philippines, and the kansai region of japan), "maccer's" (in ireland), "maccas" (in new zealand and australia) or "de mac" (in the netherlands). thomas friedman once said that no country with a mcdonald's had gone to war with another.[8] however, the "golden arches theory of conflict prevention" is not strictly true. careful historians point to the 1989 united states invasion of panama, when nato bombed serbia in 1999, and the 2006 lebanon war as exceptions. some observers have suggested that the company should be given credit for increasing the standard of service in markets that it enters. a group of anthropologists in a study entitled golden arches east (stanford university press, 1998, edited by james l. watson) looked at the impact mcdonald's had on east asia, and hong kong in particular. when it opened in hong kong in 1975, mcdonald's was the first restaurant to consistently offer clean restrooms, driving customers to demand the same of other restaurants and institutions. in east asia in particular, mcdonald's have become a symbol for the desire to embrace western cultural norms. mcdonald's have recently taken to partnering up with sinopec, china's second largest oil company, in the people's republic of china, as it begins to take advantage of china's growing use of personal vehicles by opening numerous drive-thru restaurants. [9] in addition to its effect on business standards, mcdonald's has also been instrumental in changing local customs. by popularizing the idea of a quick restaurant meal, watson's study suggests, mcdonald's led to the easing or elimination of various taboos, such as eating while walking in japan.[dubious – discuss] criticismpotted plants at a mcdonald's. the company has been a target of criticism practically since its inception. since the mid-1990s this protest has taken the form of an anti-globalization movement as documented in naomi klein's manifesto no logo. mcdonald's restaurants have been the targets of protests, peaceful and otherwise, by environmental, anti-globalization and animal rights activists. the company has used a litigious approach to protecting its business interests. this conflict, and the company's approach to resolving it, was epitomized in the early 1990s by what came to be known as the mclibel case. two british activists, david morris and helen steel, distributed leaflets entitled what's wrong with mcdonald's? on the streets of london. mcdonald's wrote to steel and morris demanding they desist and apologize, and, when they refused, sued them for libel. the trial lasted more than two years. the company's advertising techniques and business practices were scrutinized in the high court of justice in london and reported extensively in the press, who saw the case as a david and goliath battle (under uk law, legal aid could not be granted for a defamation suit, so steel and morris did most of their own legal casework while mcdonald's was represented by an extensive legal team). in june 1997, the judge ruled in favor of mcdonald's, awarding the company £60,000 damages, which was later reduced to £40,000 by the court of appeal. the amount was low because the judge ruled that some of the claims made by morris and steel had been proved, including that mcdonald's exploited children in its advertising, was anti-trade union and indirectly exploited and caused suffering to animals. steel and morris announced they had no intention of ever paying, and the company later confirmed it would not be pursuing the money. steel and morris later successfully challenged uk libel law in the european court, arguing that it was an infringement of the right to free speech. the british government was forced to re-write the legislation as a result. in 2005, a film by ken loach was made about the court case. in 2001, eric schlosser's book fast food nation included criticism of mcdonald's' business practices. among the critiques are allegations that mcdonald's (along with other companies within the fast-food industry) uses its political influence to increase their own profits at the expense of people's health and the social conditions of its workers. the book also brings into question mcdonald's advertisement techniques where it targets children. while the book does mention other fast-food chains, it focuses primarily on mcdonald's. in 2002, vegetarian groups, largely hindu, successfully sued mcdonald's for misrepresenting their french fries as vegetarian.[10] even after the discontinuation of frying the french fries in beef tallow in 1990, the french fries still had beef extract added to them. the french fries sold in the u.s. still contain beef and animal flavoring. mcdonald's biscuits also contain beef flavoring along with animal flavoring. also in 2004, morgan spurlock's documentary film super size me said that mcdonald's food was contributing to the epidemic of obesity in society, and failing to provide nutritional information about its food for its customers. for 30 days spurlock ate nothing but mcdonald's (supersizing whenever asked). he ate everything on the menu at least once and continued to eat after he was full. at the same time he consciously attempted to get little or no exercise. by the end of the month he had gained 24.5 pounds (11.11 kg), was moody and had less interest in sex. others have disputed spurlock's claims (see below). after the film was shown at the sundance film festival, but before its cinematic release, mcdonald's stated it was phasing out its supersize meal option and would begin offering several healthier menu items, though no link to the film was cited in this decision. however, while the healthier menu items have appeared, the supersize meal option still remains available at some locations. the company also began a practice of putting nutritional information for all menu items in light grey small print on the reverse of their tray liners. it is currently phasing in nutritional labeling in clear black print on the actual packaging of its food items. anthony bourdain on his show, no reservations, has criticised mcdonald's among other fast-food restaurants for its culinary blandness. legal challenge over trans fats in september 2002, mcdonald’s announced it was voluntarily reducing the trans fat content of its cooking oil by february 2003. because of operational problems, the oil was not changed on time. in the ensuing lawsuits, plaintiffs claimed that mcdonald’s didn't do enough to inform the public that the oil was not changed. the bantransfat.com website contains testimonials from people, one claims she thought the oil was low in trans fat, and she said, "that is why i have been eating there every week..." in a settlement agreement, bantransfat.com said "while there is a difference of opinion regarding whether mcdonald’s gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, mcdonald’s deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels ... and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils." nevertheless, bantransfat.com demanded monetary damages. settlement of the lawsuit brought by bantransfats.com and one private party requires mcdonald’s spend up to $1.5 million to publish notices on the status of its trans fat initiative. mcdonald’s will also donate $7 million to the american heart association for public education about trans fat. [3]. the settlement also requires some money be paid directly to bantransfat.com. the california superior court for marin county has entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. supporters of mcdonald's point out that the company is successful because it meets the needs of customers and adapts to its customers wants. in response to public pressure, mcdonald's has sought to include more healthy choices in its menu and has introduced a new slogan to its recruitment posters: "not bad for a mcjob". (the word mcjob, first attested in the mid-1980s[11] and later popularized by canadian novelist douglas coupland in his book generation x, has become a buzz word for low-paid, unskilled work with few prospects or benefits and little security.) mcdonald's disputes the idea that its restaurant jobs have no prospects, noting that its ceo, jim skinner, started working at the company as a regular restaurant employee, and that 20 of its top 50 managers began work as regular crew members. [12] in 2007, the company launched an advertising campaign with the slogan "would you like a career with that?" on irish television, outlining that their jobs have many prospects. in a bid to tap into growing consumer interest in the provenance of food, the fast-food chain recently switched its supply of both coffee beans and milk. uk chief executive steve easterbrook said: “british consumers are increasingly interested in the quality, sourcing and ethics of the food and drink they buy". mcdonald's coffee is now brewed from beans taken from stocks that have been certified by the conservation group the rainforest alliance. similarly, milk supplies used for its hot drinks and milkshakes have been switched to organic sources which could account for 5% of the uk's organic milk output[13]. in other cases, the firm has shown itself ready to adjust its business practices. when the public became concerned that product packaging was environmentally damaging, mcdonald's started a joint project with friends of the earth to eliminate the use of polystyrene containers, only in the united states, and to reduce the amount of waste produced. throughout the mclibel trial, senior representatives of the firm said they were merely trying to protect its image from undue and unfounded attack. with regard to its numerous and often controversial copyright and trademark actions, mcdonald's lawyers say they are simply protecting the company's intellectual property. super size me has been characterized as a non-scientific publicity stunt. the subject of the film consumes massive quantities of mcdonald's food, to the point of being sickened by it. eating on an hourly schedule and, as part of his rules, eating additional quantities each time a mcdonald's worker says the word "supersize," the subject gains weight. following the release of the film super size me, some people reported they had experienced no weight gain and suffered no ill effect by eating only at mcdonald's for a month, but choosing menu items more judiciously and exercising frequently.minimize me merab morgan, a north carolina woman, was even able to lose weight.woman loses 33 lb on mcdonald's diet she claimed that the transparency of nutritional information made it easy to control her daily caloric intake. global impact mcdonald's has become emblematic of globalization, sometimes referred as the "mcdonaldization" of society. the economist magazine uses the "big mac index": the comparison of a big mac's cost in various world currencies can be used to informally judge these currencies' purchasing power parity. because mcdonald's is closely identified with american culture and lifestyle, its international business expansion has been termed[by who?] part of americanization and american cultural imperialism. mcdonald's is a perpetual target of various and often conflicting anti-globalization protests worldwide. the brand is known informally as "mickey d's" (in the us and canada), "macky d's" (in the uk), "mcdo" (in france, quebec, the philippines, and the kansai region of japan), "maccer's" (in ireland), "maccas" (in new zealand and australia) or "de mac" (in the netherlands). thomas friedman once said that no country with a mcdonald's had gone to war with another.[8] however, the "golden arches theory of conflict prevention" is not strictly true. careful historians point to the 1989 united states invasion of panama, when nato bombed serbia in 1999, and the 2006 lebanon war as exceptions. some observers have suggested that the company should be given credit for increasing the standard of service in markets that it enters. a group of anthropologists in a study entitled golden arches east (stanford university press, 1998, edited by james l. watson) looked at the impact mcdonald's had on east asia, and hong kong in particular. when it opened in hong kong in 1975, mcdonald's was the first restaurant to consistently offer clean restrooms, driving customers to demand the same of other restaurants and institutions. in east asia in particular, mcdonald's have become a symbol for the desire to embrace western cultural norms. mcdonald's have recently taken to partnering up with sinopec, china's second largest oil company, in the people's republic of china, as it begins to take advantage of china's growing use of personal vehicles by opening numerous drive-thru restaurants. [9] in addition to its effect on business standards, mcdonald's has also been instrumental in changing local customs. by popularizing the idea of a quick restaurant meal, watson's study suggests, mcdonald's led to the easing or elimination of various taboos, such as eating while walking in japan.[dubious – discuss] criticismpotted plants at a mcdonald's. the company has been a target of criticism practically since its inception. since the mid-1990s this protest has taken the form of an anti-globalization movement as documented in naomi klein's manifesto no logo. mcdonald's restaurants have been the targets of protests, peaceful and otherwise, by environmental, anti-globalization and animal rights activists. the company has used a litigious approach to protecting its business interests. this conflict, and the company's approach to resolving it, was epitomized in the early 1990s by what came to be known as the mclibel case. two british activists, david morris and helen steel, distributed leaflets entitled what's wrong with mcdonald's? on the streets of london. mcdonald's wrote to steel and morris demanding they desist and apologize, and, when they refused, sued them for libel. the trial lasted more than two years. the company's advertising techniques and business practices were scrutinized in the high court of justice in london and reported extensively in the press, who saw the case as a david and goliath battle (under uk law, legal aid could not be granted for a defamation suit, so steel and morris did most of their own legal casework while mcdonald's was represented by an extensive legal team). in june 1997, the judge ruled in favor of mcdonald's, awarding the company £60,000 damages, which was later reduced to £40,000 by the court of appeal. the amount was low because the judge ruled that some of the claims made by morris and steel had been proved, including that mcdonald's exploited children in its advertising, was anti-trade union and indirectly exploited and caused suffering to animals. steel and morris announced they had no intention of ever paying, and the company later confirmed it would not be pursuing the money. steel and morris later successfully challenged uk libel law in the european court, arguing that it was an infringement of the right to free speech. the british government was forced to re-write the legislation as a result. in 2005, a film by ken loach was made about the court case. in 2001, eric schlosser's book fast food nation included criticism of mcdonald's' business practices. among the critiques are allegations that mcdonald's (along with other companies within the fast-food industry) uses its political influence to increase their own profits at the expense of people's health and the social conditions of its workers. the book also brings into question mcdonald's advertisement techniques where it targets children. while the book does mention other fast-food chains, it focuses primarily on mcdonald's. in 2002, vegetarian groups, largely hindu, successfully sued mcdonald's for misrepresenting their french fries as vegetarian.[10] even after the discontinuation of frying the french fries in beef tallow in 1990, the french fries still had beef extract added to them. the french fries sold in the u.s. still contain beef and animal flavoring. mcdonald's biscuits also contain beef flavoring along with animal flavoring. also in 2004, morgan spurlock's documentary film super size me said that mcdonald's food was contributing to the epidemic of obesity in society, and failing to provide nutritional information about its food for its customers. for 30 days spurlock ate nothing but mcdonald's (supersizing whenever asked). he ate everything on the menu at least once and continued to eat after he was full. at the same time he consciously attempted to get little or no exercise. by the end of the month he had gained 24.5 pounds (11.11 kg), was moody and had less interest in sex. others have disputed spurlock's claims (see below). after the film was shown at the sundance film festival, but before its cinematic release, mcdonald's stated it was phasing out its supersize meal option and would begin offering several healthier menu items, though no link to the film was cited in this decision. however, while the healthier menu items have appeared, the supersize meal option still remains available at some locations. the company also began a practice of putting nutritional information for all menu items in light grey small print on the reverse of their tray liners. it is currently phasing in nutritional labeling in clear black print on the actual packaging of its food items. anthony bourdain on his show, no reservations, has criticised mcdonald's among other fast-food restaurants for its culinary blandness. legal challenge over trans fats in september 2002, mcdonald’s announced it was voluntarily reducing the trans fat content of its cooking oil by february 2003. because of operational problems, the oil was not changed on time. in the ensuing lawsuits, plaintiffs claimed that mcdonald’s didn't do enough to inform the public that the oil was not changed. the bantransfat.com website contains testimonials from people, one claims she thought the oil was low in trans fat, and she said, "that is why i have been eating there every week..." in a settlement agreement, bantransfat.com said "while there is a difference of opinion regarding whether mcdonald’s gave effective notice to its customers that the oil was not changed, mcdonald’s deserves recognition and credit for having achieved a reduction in the trans fat levels ... and for working diligently over the last two years to test additional cooking oils." nevertheless, bantransfat.com demanded monetary damages. settlement of the lawsuit brought by bantransfats.com and one private party requires mcdonald’s spend up to $1.5 million to publish notices on the status of its trans fat initiative. mcdonald’s will also donate $7 million to the american heart association for public education about trans fat. [3]. the settlement also requires some money be paid directly to bantransfat.com. the california superior court for marin county has entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. supporters of mcdonald's point out that the company is successful because it meets the needs of customers and adapts to its customers wants. in response to public pressure, mcdonald's has sought to include more healthy choices in its menu and has introduced a new slogan to its recruitment posters: "not bad for a mcjob". (the word mcjob, first attested in the mid-1980s[11] and later popularized by canadian novelist douglas coupland in his book generation x, has become a buzz word for low-paid, unskilled work with few prospects or benefits and little security.) mcdonald's disputes the idea that its restaurant jobs have no prospects, noting that its ceo, jim skinner, started working at the company as a regular restaurant employee, and that 20 of its top 50 managers began work as regular crew members. [12] in 2007, the company launched an advertising campaign with the slogan "would you like a career with that?" on irish television, outlining that their jobs have many prospects. in a bid to tap into growing consumer interest in the provenance of food, the fast-food chain recently switched its supply of both coffee beans and milk. uk chief executive steve easterbrook said: “british consumers are increasingly interested in the quality, sourcing and ethics of the food and drink they buy". mcdonald's coffee is now brewed from beans taken from stocks that have been certified by the conservation group the rainforest alliance. similarly, milk supplies used for its hot drinks and milkshakes have been switched to organic sources which could account for 5% of the uk's organic milk output[13]. in other cases, the firm has shown itself ready to adjust its business practices. when the public became concerned that product packaging was environmentally damaging, mcdonald's started a joint project with friends of the earth to eliminate the use of polystyrene containers, only in the united states, and to reduce the amount of waste produced. throughout the mclibel trial, senior representatives of the firm said they were merely trying to protect its image from undue and unfounded attack. with regard to its numerous and often controversial copyright and trademark actions, mcdonald's lawyers say they are simply protecting the company's intellectual property. super size me has been characterized as a non-scientific publicity stunt. the subject of the film consumes massive quantities of mcdonald's food, to the point of being sickened by it. eating on an hourly schedule and, as part of his rules, eating additional quantities each time a mcdonald's worker says the word "supersize," the subject gains weight. following the release of the film super size me, some people reported they had experienced no weight gain and suffered no ill effect by eating only at mcdonald's for a month, but choosing menu items more judiciously and exercising frequently.minimize me merab morgan, a north carolina woman, was even able to lose weight.woman loses 33 lb on mcdonald's diet she claimed that the transparency of nutritional information made it easy to control her daily caloric intake.

Well looks like you found a way around it by copy/pasting! That's over 45,000 characters .. Congrats, & Wikipedia rules!

Powered by

My theory on this is the fallowing. during the cold war the many of the markets were closed now since russia and china are done with their social experiments nearly half the globe became open to our money and since it is a free market money escaped the us and entered those new markets. before the us revolution great britain had policies to limit trade and make sure that preferable trade balance existed between colonies and gb. with the two world wars europe needed help and american was there to assist them while ripping the benefits of destroyed industries in england,france,east germany etc...... therefore allowing economic growth due to reconstruction efforts by the marshall plan. human migration from africa asia helped to boost the economy. now since were finally reaching fair globalization practices the concentration of money is escaping the us and is going to developing nations. this means in my theory that americans will get poorer while others will get richer eventually leading to an equilibrium where resources would coast the same everywhere and the implementation of a global currency to sustain economic stability on the global scale. japan is a perfect example of flat economy.

A very flat market isn't likely. Big institutions move the markets and usually they have little to gain by a flat market. That would mean no volume and fewer stock transactions.

Powered by

I went to sell something off craigslist and the person snagged my touch phone out of my hands and ran , now i owe this test and i cant even concentrate, i can barely even look at the screen without crying, i have no money left and am so hungry. 1. (tco 3) the value of goods imported into france exceeds the value of french exports. this indicates that france: (points: 1) will experience an exchange rate decrease utilizes high tariffs will incur a budget deficit has a balance of trade deficit 2. (tco 3) the difference between money coming into a country (from exports) and money leaving the country (for imports) plus money flows from other factors such as tourism, foreign aid, and military expenditures is referred to as the: (points: 1) balance of payments balance of trade balance of money flows exchange rate 3. (tco 3) country a is an extremely efficient producer of tin. however, its climate and terrain make it difficult to produce corn. according to the theory of comparative advantage, country a should: (points: 1) produce both tin and corn in order to remain self-sufficient watch the global market to see which product is bringing the highest price import the resources needed to produce corn concentrate its production on tin and buy corn from an efficient producer 4. (tco 3) the u.s. government has announced a five-million-pound annual limit on beef imported from argentina. this type of trade restriction is called a(n): (points: 1) embargo revenue tariff import quota export cap 5. (tco 1) casey is typical of many u.s. businesspeople. casey feels the u.s. culture defines the model for the rest of the world, and that the american way of doing things is the best. casey is guilty of: (points: 1) ethnic plagiarism ethnocentricity culture shock counter culture 6. (tco 3) hennessy hardware, a u.s. retailer, buys much of its inventory from asian countries. hennessy hardware would benefit if the value of the dollar ________ relative to the currencies of the countries from which hennessy imports (points: 1) rose fell remained constant floated unpredictably 7. (tco 3) firms such as mcdonald's, pizza hut, and kfc have entered the global market by offering investors the opportunity to set up: (points: 1) licensed trade offices independent exporting houses multinational subsidiaries franchises 8. (tco 3) pepsi cola has entered into a long-term contract with a south african beverage business. the contract calls for the south african firm to produce and market pepsi cola in south africa. pepsi will receive a royalty on each case of soda sold. this is an example of: (points: 1) licensing a joint venture a foreign subsidiary foreign direct investment 9. (tco 1) a form of foreign direct investment, in which a domestic company purchases a company in a foreign country to produce a similar product or service is a: (points: 1) licensor joint venture foreign subsidiary host company 10. (tco3) the concept of free trade means: (points: 1) buyers and sellers contract with each other and offer some goods at no cost goods and services can be traded freely across borders without political and/or economic barriers there is no exchange of currency for these products there is no exchange of currency, but the trading partners determine the value of the product and perform a bartering process to exchange goods 11. (tco 3) monique's unique tile boutique offers decorative tile from around the world. the owner regularly travels overseas to locate the best and most unusual tile that foreign producers have to offer. monique participates in _____________ (points: 1) importing licensing dumping exporting 12. (tco 3) __________ occurs when a country has a monopoly on producing a product or is able to produce it at a cost well below that of all other countries (points: 1) comparative advantage absolute advantage complete advantage dumping advantage 13. (tco 3) __________ occurs when a country has a monopoly on producing a product, as with an abundant source of natural resources, or is able to produce it at a cost well below that of all other countries (points: 1) comparative advantage absolute advantage complete advantage dumping advantage 14. (tco 3) the federal government created ___________ to help small and medium sized businesses get involved in exporting (points: 1) the world trade organization federal export loan banks export assis

You'll have better luck posting a question rather than your homework assignment for someone else to do for you.